Skip to content

Added Clone implementation for ChunkBy #138016

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

nwoods-cimpress
Copy link

@nwoods-cimpress nwoods-cimpress commented Mar 4, 2025

Added Clone implementation for ChunkBy

Closes #137969.

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Mar 4, 2025

r? @Noratrieb

rustbot has assigned @Noratrieb.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Mar 4, 2025
@@ -3372,6 +3372,13 @@ where
#[stable(feature = "slice_group_by", since = "1.77.0")]
impl<'a, T: 'a, P> FusedIterator for ChunkBy<'a, T, P> where P: FnMut(&T, &T) -> bool {}

#[stable(feature = "slice_group_by", since = "1.77.0")]
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You'll need a new feature name with the version CURRENT_RUSTC_VERSION in since.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@thaliaarchi i think i got it 🤞 , bear with me if i made a newbie mistake

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Well it looks good to me! I’m not in a Rust team, so my approval doesn’t mean anything, but you should hear back from someone within two weeks.

@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

should get a t-libs-api reviewer

r? libs-api

@rustbot rustbot added the T-libs-api Relevant to the library API team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Mar 5, 2025
@rustbot rustbot assigned joshtriplett and unassigned Noratrieb Mar 5, 2025
@compiler-errors compiler-errors added the I-libs-api-nominated Nominated for discussion during a libs-api team meeting. label Mar 5, 2025
@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

compiler-errors commented Mar 5, 2025

cc:

No mention of Clone as far as I can see, so perhaps this was just an oversight?

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Mar 8, 2025

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #138208) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@rustbot rustbot added has-merge-commits PR has merge commits, merge with caution. S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Mar 10, 2025
@rustbot

This comment has been minimized.

@rustbot rustbot removed has-merge-commits PR has merge commits, merge with caution. S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Mar 10, 2025
@m-ou-se m-ou-se added S-waiting-on-fcp Status: PR is in FCP and is awaiting for FCP to complete. needs-fcp This change is insta-stable, or significant enough to need a team FCP to proceed. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. I-libs-api-nominated Nominated for discussion during a libs-api team meeting. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Mar 18, 2025
@m-ou-se
Copy link
Member

m-ou-se commented Mar 18, 2025

@rfcbot merge

@rfcbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rfcbot commented Mar 18, 2025

Team member @m-ou-se has proposed to merge this. The next step is review by the rest of the tagged team members:

No concerns currently listed.

Once a majority of reviewers approve (and at most 2 approvals are outstanding), this will enter its final comment period. If you spot a major issue that hasn't been raised at any point in this process, please speak up!

See this document for info about what commands tagged team members can give me.

@rfcbot rfcbot added the proposed-final-comment-period Proposed to merge/close by relevant subteam, see T-<team> label. Will enter FCP once signed off. label Mar 18, 2025
@rfcbot rfcbot added the disposition-merge This issue / PR is in PFCP or FCP with a disposition to merge it. label Mar 18, 2025
@datdenkikniet
Copy link

Just to make sure that the relevant issue is tracked/closed once this is fully merged & done: this PR fixes #137969

@nwoods-cimpress
Copy link
Author

Got to ask, its been two months. Is there anything that needs to happen to move this PR forward?

@dtolnay
Copy link
Member

dtolnay commented May 30, 2025

It is waiting on an approval by at least one of @Amanieu or @BurntSushi or @joshtriplett.

@rfcbot rfcbot added final-comment-period In the final comment period and will be merged soon unless new substantive objections are raised. and removed proposed-final-comment-period Proposed to merge/close by relevant subteam, see T-<team> label. Will enter FCP once signed off. labels Jun 1, 2025
@rfcbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rfcbot commented Jun 1, 2025

🔔 This is now entering its final comment period, as per the review above. 🔔

@rfcbot rfcbot added finished-final-comment-period The final comment period is finished for this PR / Issue. to-announce Announce this issue on triage meeting and removed final-comment-period In the final comment period and will be merged soon unless new substantive objections are raised. labels Jun 11, 2025
@rfcbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rfcbot commented Jun 11, 2025

The final comment period, with a disposition to merge, as per the review above, is now complete.

As the automated representative of the governance process, I would like to thank the author for their work and everyone else who contributed.

This will be merged soon.

Copy link
Member

@dtolnay dtolnay left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@dtolnay
Copy link
Member

dtolnay commented Jun 11, 2025

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jun 11, 2025

📌 Commit e48617f has been approved by dtolnay

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added the S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. label Jun 11, 2025
workingjubilee added a commit to workingjubilee/rustc that referenced this pull request Jun 12, 2025
…e, r=dtolnay

Added `Clone` implementation for `ChunkBy`

Added `Clone` implementation for `ChunkBy`

Closes rust-lang#137969.
workingjubilee added a commit to workingjubilee/rustc that referenced this pull request Jun 12, 2025
…e, r=dtolnay

Added `Clone` implementation for `ChunkBy`

Added `Clone` implementation for `ChunkBy`

Closes rust-lang#137969.
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 12, 2025
…e, r=dtolnay

Added `Clone` implementation for `ChunkBy`

Added `Clone` implementation for `ChunkBy`

Closes rust-lang#137969.
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 12, 2025
Rollup of 9 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #138016 (Added `Clone` implementation for `ChunkBy`)
 - #140770 (add `extern "custom"` functions)
 - #141162 (refactor  `AttributeGate` and `rustc_attr!` to emit notes during feature checking)
 - #141474 (Add `ParseMode::Diagnostic` and fix multiline spans in diagnostic attribute lints)
 - #141947 (Specify that "option-like" enums must be `#[repr(Rust)]` to be ABI-compatible with their non-1ZST field.)
 - #142135 (docs: autogenerate compiler flag stubs based on -Zhelp)
 - #142252 (Improve clarity of `core::sync::atomic` docs about "Considerations" in regards to CAS operations)
 - #142337 (miri: add flag to suppress float non-determinism)
 - #142353 (compiler: Ease off the accelerator on `unsupported_calling_conventions`)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 12, 2025
…e, r=dtolnay

Added `Clone` implementation for `ChunkBy`

Added `Clone` implementation for `ChunkBy`

Closes rust-lang#137969.
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 12, 2025
Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #138016 (Added `Clone` implementation for `ChunkBy`)
 - #140770 (add `extern "custom"` functions)
 - #141162 (refactor  `AttributeGate` and `rustc_attr!` to emit notes during feature checking)
 - #141474 (Add `ParseMode::Diagnostic` and fix multiline spans in diagnostic attribute lints)
 - #141947 (Specify that "option-like" enums must be `#[repr(Rust)]` to be ABI-compatible with their non-1ZST field.)
 - #142252 (Improve clarity of `core::sync::atomic` docs about "Considerations" in regards to CAS operations)
 - #142337 (miri: add flag to suppress float non-determinism)
 - #142353 (compiler: Ease off the accelerator on `unsupported_calling_conventions`)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
disposition-merge This issue / PR is in PFCP or FCP with a disposition to merge it. finished-final-comment-period The final comment period is finished for this PR / Issue. needs-fcp This change is insta-stable, or significant enough to need a team FCP to proceed. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. S-waiting-on-fcp Status: PR is in FCP and is awaiting for FCP to complete. T-libs-api Relevant to the library API team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. to-announce Announce this issue on triage meeting
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

std::slice::ChunkBy should implement Clone